in auditing and reviewing its 2014 and Q1/2015 financial statements where the auditor expressed qualified opinions due to limitation on scope of audit imposed by the company management. EIC must submit
accounting principles. Moreover, the auditor was unable to find sufficient supporting evidence to satisfy the audit procedures due to limitation on scope of audit imposed by the PICNI management in various
of Limitation and Settlement Committee _________________ Division 1 Administrative Sanction _____________ SECTION 67 The administrative sanctions are as follows: (1) probation; (2) administrative fine
for transactions in the capital market; Whereas this Act contains certain provisions relating to the restriction of rights and liberties of persons, which Section 29, in conjunction with Section 32
the unit holders, under Clause 23 and Clause 24; (16) the restriction of unit holders’ right when exceeding the holding ratio or when having extraordinary interest in the matter, under Clause 25; (17
Bhumibol Adulyadej is graciously pleased to proclaim that: Whereas it is expedient to enact a law governing derivatives transactions; Whereas this Act contains certain provisions relating to the restriction
amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4) B.E. 2551 and Section 63(5) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 which contains certain provisions relating to the restriction of rights and
’ qualified opinions resulted from limitation on their scope of audit/review. Hence, the auditors were unable to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence with respect to valuation of investment in PT
the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) and Section 8(1) and Section 76 of the Trust for Transactions in Capital Market Act B.E. 2550 (2007) which contain certain provision in relation to the restriction
limitation to only debt securities, excluding company licensed to also undertake finance business. “Finance and securities company” means a company licensed to undertake finance business, and securities