time of the incident, was considered that he deceived by presenting false statements and concealing facts that should have been disclosed to its clients, which led the clients to use Zipup/ZipUp
at the Millennium Hilton Bangkok without filing the registration statement and the draft prospectus with the SEC Office. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.65
decoration equipment from Budget Ltd. and New Tique Ltd. to conceal expenses. It led to decrease of loss in the financial statements for Q1-Q2/2003 of DAIDO. Such actions misled DAIDO’s shareholders or any
decoration equipment from Budget Ltd. and New Tique Ltd. to conceal expenses. It led to decrease of loss in the financial statements for Q1-Q2/2003 of DAIDO. Such actions misled DAIDO’s shareholders or any
decoration equipment from Budget Ltd. and New Tique Ltd. in order to conceal expenses. It led to decrease of loss in the financial statements for Q1-Q2/2003 of DAIDO, thereby misleading DAIDO’s shareholders or
punishment of 2-year imprisonment and 8,000,000 Baht fine. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment and 4,000,000 baht. The jail term was
Derivatives Act B.E.2546. The Bangkok South Criminal Court fined the accused of Baht 40,000. As the accused confessed, the fine was reduced by half to a fine of Baht 20,000. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint
40,000. As the accused confessed, the penalty was reduced by half to a 6 months imprisonment and a fine of Baht 20,000. Since the accused had never been sentenced to imprisonment, the jail term was
. The case was deemed final. DV Act S.343 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 18/12/2009
(TUCC) during October 1 - 31, 2007, and S.E.C Auto Sales and Services PLC (SECC) during September 12 - November 24, 2008 by allowing the use of his trading account and facilitating price settlement. On