further fine of Baht 500 each day starting from the next day of the judgment date until the company so complies. SEC Act S.56 and 199 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 27/01/2014
• Audit Committee, Glow Energy Public Company Limited • Audit Committee, Charoen Pokphand Foods Public Company Limited Work experience : • Government permanent teaching staff, Faculty of Commerce and
judgment date until the company so complies. SEC Act S.56 and 199 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 21/04/2014
in a fine of Baht 30,000 and a further fine of Baht 1,000 each day starting from the judgment date until the company so complies. SEC Act S.56(1)(2)(3)(4) and199 Criminal Complaint Filed with an
Q2/2018, compared with the same period of 2017, comes from the adjustment of the provision from liabilities in Joint Venture according to the Supreme Court judgment which has previously been recorded
judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case and sentenced the accused to12 year imprisonment for breaching of Section 56 and Section 312 of Securities and Exchange
containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 The Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the
fine of Baht 30,000 and a further fine of Baht 1,000 each day starting from the judgment date until the company so complies. SEC Act S.300 in conjunction with 56(1)(2)(3)(4) and 199 Criminal Complaint
plaintiff who commences the case shall pay for the Court fees only for the relief sought in the part of the plaintiff. Moreover, the counsel for the plaintiff shall be awarded when the Court renders judgment
terminal growth rate and discounted rate used in the assumptions are based on management of the subsidiary’s judgment and past experience and business plan, as well as the future prediction that is believed