Gilt Edge International (Group) LTd. 1. Gilt Edge International (Group) LTd. – Thailand representative office, represented by Mrs. Karen Elizabeth Entwistle, the representative office solicited the

Bath 3.50 per share which was higher than tender offer price Baht 1.25 per share. Therefor, the tender offer price given to all holders of securities of the same class and issue was not in the same form

order and control STARK to issue rectified financial statement, but he neglected his duties and consented to the falsification of STARK and its subsidiaries’ financial statements. Moreover, Mr. Prakorn

million baht to solve the issue of decreasing capital adequacy ratio below the requirement specified under the Insurance Law. He obtained the material non- public information by virtue of his positions

that TIP had to increase its registered capital shares at the amount of 250 million baht to solve the issue of decreasing capital adequacy ratio below the requirement specified under the Insurance Law

non-public information concerning that TIP had to increase its registered capital shares at the amount of 250 million baht to solve the issue of decreasing capital adequacy ratio below the requirement

issue of decreasing capital adequacy ratio below the requirement specified under the Insurance Law. He obtained the material non-public information by virtue of his positions before such information

investors to make investments according to Gilt Edge’s advice and management to earn tax benefits and long-term returns. Gilt Edge also advertised that the company had a team of professional and experienced

and management to earn tax benefits and long-term returns. Gilt Edge also advertised that the company had a team of professional and experienced experts to render financial knowledge and advice as well

acceptance of the machines and approved the full payment by IEC where in fact the machines could not be found. Prosecutorial stage issue a non-prosecution order. SEC Act S.307 308 311 312 and section 352