asymmetry – Predominantly permanent (temporary) price increases (decreases) for buyer (seller) initiated block trades (Holthausen et al 1987, 1990; Keim and Madhavan 1996; Kraus and Stoll 1972) – Buys are
the end of March 31, 2019, the total asset 2,190.1 Million Baht were increased 103.1 Million Baht compare with at the end of December 31, 2018 increasing from temporary investment, trade receivables and
asymmetry of permanent and temporary price impact between buy trades and sell trades is determined primarily by market conditions. Specifically, contrary to the findings in previous studies, the results show
the operation (32.7) (203.8) 171.1 84.0% Gain (Loss) from temporary investment (15.7) (75.2) 59.5 79.1% Profit (Loss) for the year (48.4) (279.0) 230.6 82.6% Net Profit/(Loss) from the year attribute to
recorded lower Administrative expenses than the Administrative expenses in the same period ended June 30, 2016. In Q2/2016 the Company recorded the Baht 2.85 million temporary shut-down expenses in a part of
expenses than the Administrative expenses in the same period ended September 30, 2016. In Q3/2016 the Company recorded the Baht 2.07 million temporary shut-down expenses in a part of Administrative expenses
expenses than the Administrative expenses in the same period ended September 30, 2016. In Q3/2016 the Company recorded the Baht 2.07 million temporary shut-down expenses in a part of Administrative expenses
quarter and decrease 50.91% and 79.15% when compared to the same period of last year. However, we are sure that this is temporary situation for Q2/2017 only. Please see details below for reference. Please
energy costs. Total expenses were Baht 426.8 million, increased by 7.1% mainly due to writing-off obsolete assets caused by the temporary shutdown of furnace for scheduled maintenance. Expense for the
6.1% 279.4 7.2% Gross Profit 68.0 56.6 20.1% 63.3 7.4% Profit (Loss) from the operation 3.3 (26.0) 112.7% (26.4) 112.5% Gain (Loss) from temporary investment (6.3) (21.7) 71.0% 1.5 (520%) Profit (Loss