Earlier, Mr. Suphanan acting on behalf of IFEC sent a letter requesting the DBD to reveiw its order denying the registration of Mr. Wiphu Maharakkhaka and Mr. Manusak Deawwanich on IFEC directors’ list and then may exercise the right to appeal such DBD’s decision.According to Section 42 of the Administrative Procedure Act B.E. 2539 (1996), an administrative order shall be effective since the person concerned is notified and shall remain in effect until it is revoked or invalid for other re...
? assets and using a client's trading account to trade securities for his own interest.Following Apple Wealth's inspection report related to clients? complaints against Sakkarin and the SEC's further
Bangkok, 24 October 2017 ? The SEC has revoked the approval for Mr. Pisist Phong-pheuag, then working for Apple Wealth Securities Public Company Limited, as a capital market investment consultant for
Bangkok, 24 October 2017 ? The SEC has revoked the approval for Mr. Pisist Phong-pheuag, then working for Apple Wealth Securities Public Company Limited, as a capital market investment consultant for
Bangkok, May 19, 2015 ? The SEC suspended {A}, a capital market investment consultant of Apple Wealth Securities PCL, for failure to keep complete record of the securities trading orders. The SEC
directed TIES to rectify its 2014 financial statements due to the auditor?s qualified opinion in relation to the construction cost reports for construction contracts not prepared in accordance with its
The revocation followed Apple Wealth Securities’ inspection report regarding three clients’ complaints against Nutnicha and the SEC’s further investigation, which revealed Nutnicha’s misconduct as
not lose the money if making investment decision on the advice. Furthermore, {A} failed to immediately submit orders to close out derivatives positions as directed by the client, causing the client to
accessibility. A concerted effort was also directed towards elevating investor awareness and education in the realm of bond investment. The overarching aim was to strengthen the credibility of the Thai bond
. However, Mr. Suphanan failed to perform his duty as directed and submitted a clarification letter to the SEC. The SEC considered his explanation inadmissible. The SEC has viewed that Mr. Suphanan’s