by law since the date of the entry of the plaint (18 June 2019) until the payment is made in full. Moreover, the Appeal Court ordered the defendant to reimburse Appeal Court fees and attorney fees to
2020. Moreover, the Appeal Court ordered the defendant to reimburse Appeal Court fees and attorney fees to the plaintiff.16/10/2019 The Civil Court delivered a judgement that the defendant had
Director-General of DSI’s conflicting opinion on additional charges under Section 307, 308, 309, 311, 313 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act and under Section 264 and 268 of the Penal Code, and on
-General of DSI’s conflicting opinion on additional charges under Section 307, 308, 309, 311, 313 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act and under Section 264 and 268 of the Penal Code, and on the
ZipUp+, which is the service of Zipmex Pte. Ltd, and gained benefits from digital asset exchange fees. Additionally, such operation of Zipmex had no measure to protect the conflict of interest and to
Commission inquiring about the conditions, rules, and fees for applying a digital asset exchange license. The aforementioned actions by CoinEx and Mr. Puttipong are deemed to be conducting digital asset
Exchanges Commission inquiring about the conditions, rules, and fees for applying a digital asset exchange license. The aforementioned actions by CoinEx and Mr. Puttipong are deemed to be conducting digital
September 2020) until the payment is made in full. Moreover, the Civil Court ordered all defendants to jointly reimburse Court fees and attorney fees to the plaintiff.03/09/2020 filed a lawsuit to a
payment is made in full. Moreover, the Civil Court ordered all defendants to jointly reimburse Court fees and attorney fees to the plaintiff.03/09/2020 filed a lawsuit to a civil court20/02