repurchase project. However, at the time, the total proceeds from the capital fundraising through the private placement had already been fully utilized. Furthermore, STARK lacked retained earnings or
lacked retained earnings or sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could materially mislead
been fully utilized. Furthermore, STARK lacked retained earnings or sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information
lacked retained earnings or sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could materially mislead
. Furthermore, STARK lacked retained earnings or sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could
PICNI containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. The Appeal Court overturned the
containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 The Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the
) Mr.Poonsak Chumchuay, (3) Mr. Thakorn Taweesri and (4) Mr.Danuj Bunnag jointly maliciously created a false debt for POLAR in order to prevent his creditor from receiving full or part payment and made false
. Yanakorn Warakunrak, (3) Mr. Thakorn Taweesri and (4) Mr.Danuj Bunnag jointly maliciously created a false debt for POLAR in order to prevent his creditor from receiving full or part payment and made false
) Mr.Poonsak Chumchuay, (3) Mr. Thakorn Taweesri and (4) Mr.Danuj Bunnag, former director and directors, jointly maliciously created a false debt for POLAR in order to prevent his creditor from receiving full