as the definitions of each final risk level. 3 To what extent, does each relevant source contribute to the identification of quality objectives, quality risks, and responses? Please provide an estimate
points/concerns have been followed up. B9 Where the firm operates as part of a network under common monitoring policies and procedures: (a) Whether the firm receives the overall scope, extent, and results
and extent of an engagement quality review (b) Requirements for the EQr to obtain understandings and information communicated by the engagement team and the firm. (c) Direction and supervision of AEQr
conduct internal audit work for audit clients and if so what is the extent of the work? 2 IT Systems: Does the firm provide services to design provide or implement IT systems to audit client? If so, does
restoring continuity within the same river basin district to an extent that compensates the disruption of continuity, which the planned hydropower plant may cause. Compensation starts prior to the execution
that the firm considers as high risk? Please describe the relevant responses to these risks B1 Who is the ultimate shareholder(s) that have ultimate control of the audit firm, and;? B2 Who has the
firm’s strategic and business plan. If yes, please describe. 2 How does the firm conduct the estimation of personnel needs (e.g. developing succession plan)? 3 How does the firm deal with the staff
is relevant and reliable information to enable proper functioning of SOQM? 2 How does the firm manage the information system (including the use of paper-based and electronic forms) to ensure that it
the quality risks in Acceptance and Continuance of Client Relationships and Specific Engagement element that the firm considers as high risk? Please describe the relevant responses to these risks. A.1
Carbon Certification: ISCC Plus) - องค์กรว่าด้วยวัสดุชีวภาพที่ยั่งยืน (Roundtable of Sustainable Biomaterials: RSB) - หลักการและเกณฑ์ความยั่งยืนของถั่วเหลือง (Round Table on Responsible Soy: RTRS) • เป็น