as the definitions of each final risk level. 3 To what extent, does each relevant source contribute to the identification of quality objectives, quality risks, and responses? Please provide an estimate
the firm have a partner or manager level individual who is responsible for its monitoring process? If yes, does the responsible person have sufficient and appropriate experience, authority, and time
Does the firm have access to current guidance materials regarding the applicable independence, integrity, and objectivity requirements? a. If “yes,” describe the source of such material (such as access
already has a share of intermittent renewables deployment of at least 20% or has credible evidence of programmes in place that increase the share of intermittent renewables to this level within the next 10
following questions. - Do personnel have an appropriate professional level or specialized expertise on difficult or contentious matters? If no, How does the firm deal with this situation? Does the firm have a
organizational structure and indicate whether there are INEs at the global, regional or local level. B6 Whether the firm has designated a Quality Management (QM) partner who takes responsibility for the firm’s
วัดผล Maturity Level 1 (M1) Maturity Level 2 (M2) Maturity Level 3 (M3) Maturity Level 4 (M4) Maturity Level 5 (M5) หมวดที่ 1 การกำกับดูแลและบริหารจัดการด้าน IT (Information Technology Governance) M1 M2
responsibilities engagement partner clearly defined and communicated to that partner? 10 Does the firm have policies and procedures regarding to the assignment of engagement teams and the level of supervision
obtaining audit evidence) ผลการประเมิน คำอธิบาย ประเภทการวัดผล Maturity Level 1 (M1) Maturity Level 2 (M2) Maturity Level 3 (M3) Maturity Level 4 (M4) Maturity Level 5 (M5) หมวดที่ 1 การกำกับดูแลและบริหาร
firm to continue the engagement; • discussing with the appropriate level of client’s management /those charged with governance the appropriate action the firm may take; • if the firm determines that it