approval on behalf of the company, colluded with Miss Tan Lethi, another BLISS investment board members and alleged offender, sought unlawful gain causing damage to BLISS. They decided or proceeded for
Miss Tan Lethi Miss Tan Lethi, then holding position as Bliss-Tel Public Company Limited (“BLISS”) investment board members having power to make securities investment decision and approval on behalf
Group Public Company Limited ("ACAP"), a GSC’s subsidiary, in the cumulative value of 180 million baht (73% of the total GSC’s asset) without the approval of shareholders. The interest rates of
subsidiary, in the cumulative value of 180 million baht (73% of the total GSC’s asset) without the approval of shareholders. The interest rates of such loans were too low. The acts mentioned above did not
subsidiary, in the cumulative value of 180 million baht (73% of the total GSC’s asset) without the approval of shareholders. The interest rates of such loans were too low. The acts mentioned above did not
subsidiary, in the cumulative value of 180 million baht (73% of the total GSC’s asset) without the approval of shareholders. The interest rates of such loans were too low. The acts mentioned above did not
subsidiary, in the cumulative value of 180 million baht (73% of the total GSC’s asset) without the approval of shareholders. The interest rates of such loans were too low. The acts mentioned above did not
subsidiary, in the cumulative value of 180 million baht (73% of the total GSC’s asset) without the approval of shareholders. The interest rates of such loans were too low. The acts mentioned above did not
, in the cumulative value of 180 million baht (73% of the total GSC’s asset) without the approval of shareholders. The interest rates of such loans were too low. The acts mentioned above did not comply
February 17, 2014. The financial statements did not comply with the Accounting Standard. That is, the company realized the gain from selling the capital investment in its subsidiary and booked in the