convincing fact that IFEC paid the payment of 60 million baht to purchase the land and building. Even though, due to the partial payment of 20 million baht provided for Mr.Sittichai and Mr.Apichart's
convincing fact that IFEC paid the payment of 60 million baht to purchase the land and building. Even though, due to the partial payment of 20 million baht provided for Mr.Sittichai and Mr.Apichart's
convincing fact that IFEC paid the payment of 60 million baht to purchase the land and building. Even though, due to the partial payment of 20 million baht provided for Mr.Sittichai and Mr.Apichart's
, we found the convincing fact that IFEC paid the payment of 60 million baht to purchase the land and building. Even though, due to the partial payment of 20 million baht provided for Mr.Sittichai and
's shares at 142 million baht. As a result, IFEC unreasonably paid T&S for the additional payment of 13 million baht. Moreover, IFEC recorded the value of CRS's shares with the amount of 155
's shares at 142 million baht. As a result, IFEC unreasonably paid T&S for the additional payment of 13 million baht. Moreover, IFEC recorded the value of CRS's shares with the amount of 155
of CRS to buy CRS's shares at 142 million baht. As a result, IFEC unreasonably paid T&S for the additional payment of 13 million baht. Moreover, IFEC recorded the value of CRS's shares
's shares at 142 million baht. As a result, IFEC unreasonably paid T&S for the additional payment of 13 million baht. Moreover, IFEC recorded the value of CRS's shares with the amount of 155
's shares at 142 million baht. As a result, IFEC unreasonably paid T&S for the additional payment of 13 million baht. Moreover, IFEC recorded the value of CRS's shares with the amount of 155
Shia Co. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht