different company names such as Global Investments Far East Limited and Global Investments International Limited. The aforesaid person jointly operated securities business without obtaining license from the

handle suitable portfolios for investors through different company names such as Global Investments Far East Limited and Global Investments International Limited. The aforesaid person jointly operated

experienced experts to render financial knowledge and advice as well as manage portfolios suitable for different clients’s profiles via three websites: www.giltedgeintl.com www.on-t3-line.com and www.online-t3

experts to render financial knowledge and advice as well as manage portfolios suitable for different clients’s profiles via three websites: www.giltedgeintl.com www.on-t3-line.com and www.online-t3.com In

as manage portfolios suitable for different clients’s profiles via three websites: www.giltedgeintl.com www.on-t3-line.com and www.online-t3.com In case, none of the aforementioned entities had been

paragraph 1 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the penalty prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) For a count of failure to submit the

for different clients’s profiles via three websites: www.giltedgeintl.com www.on-t3-line.com and www.online-t3.com In case, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities

Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56, Section 274 paragraph 1, and Section 300 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the

, in May 2017, that the estimated cost of PPC&PPE project was relatively different to the actual cost. That led to SRICHA experienced the net loss of 93.32 million Baht in the 2nd quarter of 2017

Limited), (10) Miss Rinnapa Kunawatsatit, (11) Mr. Patinya Dheva-aksorn, (12) Mrs. Kingkarn Smitananda, and (13) Mr. Praphol Milindachinla. The said persons cooperated by acting in different manners to