gained the benefit were dishonest duty performance, as specified under Section 89/7 and Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 of the SEA. The public prosecutor decided not to pursue the case in court and the case
caused damage to GSC or others obtained benefit. In this regard, they jointly decided, approved, or ordered GSC to grant 7 loans to Asia Capital Group Public Company Limited ("ACAP"), a GSC’s
caused damage to GSC or others obtained benefit. In this regard, they jointly decided, approved, or ordered GSC to grant 7 loans to Asia Capital Group Public Company Limited ("ACAP"), a GSC’s
caused damage to GSC or others obtained benefit. In this regard, they jointly decided, approved, or ordered GSC to grant 7 loans to Asia Capital Group Public Company Limited ("ACAP"), a GSC’s
caused damage to GSC or others obtained benefit. In this regard, they jointly decided, approved, or ordered GSC to grant 7 loans to Asia Capital Group Public Company Limited ("ACAP"), a GSC’s
caused damage to GSC or others obtained benefit. In this regard, they jointly decided, approved, or ordered GSC to grant 7 loans to Asia Capital Group Public Company Limited ("ACAP"), a GSC’s
damage to GSC or others obtained benefit. In this regard, they jointly decided, approved, or ordered GSC to grant 7 loans to Asia Capital Group Public Company Limited ("ACAP"), a GSC’s subsidiary
Officer and Director) jointly decided, approved and issued a cheque to pay Winsound (Thailand) Company Limited a deposit of 145 million baht on the purchase order of set-top boxes from a company located in
Officer and Director) jointly decided, approved and issued a cheque to pay Winsound (Thailand) Company Limited a deposit of 145 million baht on the purchase order of set-top boxes from a company located in
Operating Officer and Director) jointly decided, approved and issued a cheque to pay Winsound (Thailand) Company Limited a deposit of 145 million baht on the purchase order of set-top boxes from a company