the debt owed by Mr. Suthat Suklert, who had agreed to take on the debt for Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Ms. Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup, to mislead the company's auditor into believing that the debtor

owed by Mr. Suthat Suklert, who had agreed to take on the debt for Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Ms. Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup, to mislead the company's auditor into believing that the debtor owing the

the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial

the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial

believing that the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual

auditor into believing that the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the

. After receiving the loan money from GLH, the five debtor companies transferred the money within the companies of the lender’s group to repay for the interest and the principal to GLH in installment. The

inaccurate accounts to deceive the others. Owing to the fact that Mr.Ratchasak made confession beneficial to the case, the Court reduced the punishments according to Section 78 of the Penal Code. Accordingly

(SSI) via internet trading system to resulting in trading such share which was not consistent with normal market in order to lure general public to trade such share. SEC Act S.243(2) Settlement

trading such share which was not consistent with normal market conditions in order to lure general public to trade such share. SEC Act S.243(2) Settlement Committee Meeting No. 3/2016 Settlement