Shia Co. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
Shia Co. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
company assets or obtain unlawful gains for himself or other persons, causing damage to CIRKIT. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the accused failed and the
unlawful gains for himself or other persons, causing damage to CIRKIT. the public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the accused failed and the statute of limitations ran out
unlawful gains for himself or other persons, causing damage to CIRKIT. the public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the accused failed and the statute of limitations ran out
CIRKIT to misappropriate company assets or obtain unlawful gains for himself or other persons, causing damage to CIRKIT. the public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the