-W1 during the period that CIG-W1 had high cost and almost expired and eventually were all sold out during low price period. The said actions were in violation of Section 311 of the Securities and
during the period that CIG-W1 had high cost and almost expired and eventually were all sold out during low price period. The said actions were in violation of Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act
Bill of Exchange (B/E) due at the end of the year 2016. Such knowledge considered as a material fact that negatively affects the price of IFEC securities. He took advantage of other investors by
account that Mr. Yanyong provided for them, in such a way as to take advantage of other persons by using material non-public information concerning increasing value of Pluto LNG Project from additional cost
. Yanyong provided for them, in such a way as to take advantage of other persons by using material non-public information concerning increasing value of Pluto LNG Project from additional cost (Baht 2,212
, in May 2017, that the estimated cost of PPC&PPE project was relatively different to the actual cost. That led to SRICHA experienced the net loss of 93.32 million Baht in the 2nd quarter of 2017
ordering the defendants to jointly reimburse the execution cost to the plaintiff. 26/02/2018 filed a lawsuit to a civil court24/10/2017 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a
Shia Co. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP