, in May 2017, that the estimated cost of PPC&PPE project was relatively different to the actual cost. That led to SRICHA experienced the net loss of 93.32 million Baht in the 2nd quarter of 2017
ordering the defendants to jointly reimburse the execution cost to the plaintiff. 26/02/2018 filed a lawsuit to a civil court24/10/2017 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a
Shia Co. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
Shia Co. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
defendants to jointly reimburse the execution cost to the plaintiff. 26/02/2018 filed a lawsuit to a civil court24/10/2017 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a lawsuit to a civil
complaint must not exceed 27,175.50 Baht according to the request of the claimant. Moreover, the court ordered Mr. Thanawat to reimburse the execution cost and 6,000 Baht of attorney fee to the claimant.