therefore imposed a fine of 2,518,646.23 baht. As defendant made confession, the Court commuted the conviction into half to a fine of 1,259,323.11 baht. This case follows the SEC complaint against Apichart

confession that she had misappropriated the client’s money and used it for her own benefit at the approximate amount of 2.5 million baht.  SEC has considered that Sunisa failed to perform duties or provide

written confession that she had misappropriated the client’s money and used it for her own benefit at the approximate amount of 2.5 million baht. SEC has considered that Sunisa failed to perform duties

, the Court imposed the punishment prescribed for each offence* on him totaling 16-year and 36-month imprisonment and a fine of 3,760,000 baht. Considering the fact of confession, however, the Court

securities. Upon findings of Wichai?s dishonest conducts, Jadesada had adjusted approach and scope of his audit performance into the transactions in 2008-2009 which was based solely on Wichai?s confession, the

years because the confession and damage relief were considered extenuating circumstances.    

inaccurate accounts to deceive the others. Owing to the fact that Mr.Ratchasak made confession beneficial to the case, the Court reduced the punishments according to Section 78 of the Penal Code. Accordingly

securities investment records and income statement. His wrongdoings were in violation of Clause 2 of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Sections 89/7, 307, 308, 311, 312, and 313 of the SEA. With his confession

distinct and different offences. The defendants were convicted according to Section 91 of the Penal Code. As defendants had made confession, which was beneficial to the case, the Court commuted the

for his violation of Section 313 of the SEA- the provision with the harshest punishment, whereby Suradej shall be liable to 5 years imprisonment and a fine of B2,356,000,000.  Considering his confession