(Form 59) in accordance with the SEC’s regulations, as his spouse had conducted a transaction involving ARROW securities on 28 August 2020.. However, Mr. Lertchai failed to prepared and disclosed the

in securities holdings (Form 59) in accordance with the SEC’s regulations, as his spouse had conducted a transaction involving ARROW securities on 7 July 2020. However, Mr. Tanon failed to prepared

, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider approved by the SEC

, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider approved by the SEC

, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider approved by the SEC

utility token, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider approved

, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider approved by the SEC

utility token, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider approved

-use utility token, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider

of 100,000 Baht. In the event that the defendant failed to pay the said fine, execution shall be carried out in accordance with Section 29 of the Criminal Code. DAB Act S.17 Criminal Complaint Filed