responding and counterclaiming for damages in the amount by Baht 106. 3 million, including the interest, on the ground of the breach of contract against the Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the
lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company. Consequencely, the Company has not
Company. The Company’s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company
. 3. The Group had the selling and administrative expenses, amount Baht 34.08 million, increase by Baht 13.29 million or 64.15 percent due to the main reason as follows: 3.1) Lawyer expenses, amount
knowledge and ability to proceed with the class action case without a conflict of interest with members of the class, and he or she can pay the advance payment for the procedure of class action. 5. Lawyer Fee
of contract against the Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the
expenses incurred from the subsidiary’s share acquisition ie. loan , advisory and lawyer fees for an aggregated amount of THB 2.3 million. Earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation (“EBITDA”) EBITDA
Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company
memorandum for the exclusive mobile phone project. The Company’s lawyer suggested that the Company hadn’t breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in