Appeal Court rendered a judgement* amending the Civil Court’s judgement, by requiring the defendant to pay (1) a civil penalty, twice the amount of the benefits that the defendant received or would have
. Por. 5964/2562. On 22 December 2020, the Appeal Court rendered the judgement,* opposing the Civil Court’s decision. In this regard, the defendant is required to pay civil penalty twice the amount of
until the payment is fully completed, and Ekkamon to pay 333,333.33 baht. Both monetary penalties shall be submitted as state revenue. On 26 May 2020, the Court of Appeal confirmed the judgment of the
’ list and then may exercise the right to appeal such DBD’s decision.According to Section 42 of the Administrative Procedure Act B.E. 2539 (1996), an administrative order shall be effective since the
Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal Region I, Dr. Poomsiri Dumrongvute, Lecturer of the Faculty of Law, Chulalongkorn University, and Mr. Jinnah Yamuam, Money and Banking subcommittee member, Thailand
สนใจ เช่น ความเสี่ยง เครื่องมือ และแนวทางการกำกับดูแลใหม่ ๆ ได้แก่ RegTech Crypto และ Surveillance การกำกับดูแลโดยใช้ Behavioral Cluster Analysis การบริหารจัดการความปลอดภัยของระบบและข้อมูลตามมาตรฐาน
baht for the violation which occurred during August 18- October 7, 1992. The execution of imprisonments were not suspended.Later, the Appeal Court affirmed and amended the Bangkok South Criminal Court's
baht for the violation which occurred during August 18- October 7, 1992. The execution of imprisonments were not suspended.Later, the Appeal Court affirmed and amended the Bangkok South Criminal Court?s
Nuprapat and Kanchana with the Bangkok South Criminal Court.The Bangkok South Criminal Court and the Appeal Court ruled against Nuprapat and Kanchana and sentenced them to a five-year imprisonment for
action* can be another legal option for protecting investors? interest.Guest lectured by Appeal Court Judge Pongdej Wanichkittikul to stakeholders from listed companies, the Thai Investors Association and