individual auditors’ engagement. The overall results of the inspection conducted on 13 audit firms in 2016 during the third cycle, which is between 2016 to 2018, indicated continuous improvement from the
firms share our views and objectives and have made much progress in resolving their deficiencies, with the exception of few findings whose remedies are time consuming in nature. The mechanics of how audit
firms demonstrated an improvement vis-à-vis the results from the previous inspection cycle. Such improvement was undoubtedly enabled by the formulation of audit firms’ root cause analysis process and
all information on TCFD recommendations in financial report. Progress and Assessment Reporting Assess current disclosures against guidance from TCFD and other relevant reporting frameworks. Publish an
important that the auditors carefully assess the audit risks and plan their audits accordingly. This becomes particularly important as the effective date of the new auditor’s report is fast approaching, where
reporting requirements in Thailand ESG performance disclosing progress towards attaining sustainability and maintaining ethical standards in ESG criteria. 8 's 2021 report: the ‘56-1 One’ requires disclosure
from the first inspection cycle (2010-2012) to 2019, the first year of the 4th inspection cycle (2019-2021), showed promising overall improvement despite the SEC’s more intensive inspection in several
“Need Improvement” and subject to mandatory follow-up in the next cycle has dropped significantly. This progress was contributed by audit firms’ continuing emphasis on quality improvement. Heads - 02 - of
January 1, 2014 onwards, and subsequently worked with the Thaipat Institute in the development of the Anti-corruption Progress Indicator to assess listed companies in this area. Furthermore, the Thaipat
Corporate Engagement Officer CDP Southeast Asia and Oceania 09:25-09:40 Overview of TCFD recommendations and key concepts 09:40-09:50 Current status of TCFD implementation and progress 09:50-10:00 Q&A 10:00