adjudicated that the defendant was guilty under Section 17 paragraph one, Section 26, Section 57, and Section 66 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The defendant’s act constituted
order or an action which results in the offence that the company operated digital asset exchange businesses without a license. The Court of Appeal adjudicated that the defendant was guilty under Section
order or an action which results in the offence that the company offered digital tokens to the public without an approval from the SEC Office. The Court of Appeal adjudicated that the defendant was guilty
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. On October 3, 2018, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 90 and 289 of the SEC Act
and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. On October 3, 2018, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 90 and 289 of the
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. On October 3, 2018, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 90 and 289 of