discrepancy between the two Acts, which one auditor should adhere to? A: The requirement on information disclosure aims to protect auditor who has discovered suspicious circumstance acquired from normal
discrepancy between the two Acts, which one auditor should adhere to? A: The requirement on information disclosure aims to protect auditor who has discovered suspicious circumstance acquired from normal
directors or the management executives of the company perform the duties with recklessness or dishonesty causing damages to the company; or when directors or the management unlawfully acquired benefits via
investors can exercise their rights pursuant to CD / warrant A price indicated by considering demand / supply, for instance, a price acquired by book building A fair price calculated by a financial advisor
capital which have additional conditions that a write-down/ a write-off may be performed after the capital decrease and in the proportion that is not more than the capital decrease or instruments that have
fund of funds (FoFs) with investments in the underlying fund ≥ 5% of the underlying fund NAV. Where the NAV of the underlying funds on any days or in five consecutive business days decrease more than two
fund of funds (FoFs) with investments in the underlying fund ≥ 5% of the underlying fund NAV. Where the NAV of the underlying funds on any days or in five consecutive business days decrease more than two
/ a write-off may be performed after the capital decrease and in the proportion that is not more than the capital decrease or instruments that have been converted. [2] Only subordinated instruments
discrepancy between the two Acts, which one auditor should adhere to? A: The requirement on information disclosure aims to protect auditor who has discovered suspicious circumstance acquired from normal
discrepancy between the two Acts, which one auditor should adhere to? A: The requirement on information disclosure aims to protect auditor who has discovered suspicious circumstance acquired from normal