discrepancy between the two Acts, which one auditor should adhere to? A:  The requirement on information disclosure aims to protect auditor who has discovered suspicious circumstance acquired from normal

discrepancy between the two Acts, which one auditor should adhere to? A:  The requirement on information disclosure aims to protect auditor who has discovered suspicious circumstance acquired from normal

directors or the management executives of the company perform the duties with recklessness or dishonesty causing damages to the company; or when directors or the management unlawfully acquired benefits via

investors can exercise their rights pursuant to CD / warrant   A price indicated by considering demand / supply, for instance, a price acquired by book building A fair price calculated by a financial advisor

discrepancy between the two Acts, which one auditor should adhere to? A:  The requirement on information disclosure aims to protect auditor who has discovered suspicious circumstance acquired from normal

discrepancy between the two Acts, which one auditor should adhere to? A:  The requirement on information disclosure aims to protect auditor who has discovered suspicious circumstance acquired from normal

opinions to the securities holders of the business to be acquired if the tender offeror can fulfil the proposed plans, and if the proposal is justifiable. Not conspiring with the tender offeror in covering

opinions to the securities holders of the business to be acquired if the tender offeror can fulfil the proposed plans, and if the proposal is justifiable. Not conspiring with the tender offeror in covering

ชี่ อินเตอร์เนชั่นแนล จำกัด (มหาชน) COTTO - บริษัท เอสซีจี เซรามิกส์ จำกัด (มหาชน) CPALL - บริษัท ซีพี ออลล์ จำกัด (มหาชน) CPANEL - บริษัท ซีแพนเนล จำกัด (มหาชน) CPF - บริษัท เจริญโภคภัณฑ์อาหาร จำกัด