"Stable". RML acknowledged the downgrade credit rating result prior to the effective date of Filing Form but RML did not reveal this credit rating in Filing Form. 27/12/2021 agreed to comply
receivership by the Central Bankruptcy Court's order. Mr. Bhusana acknowledged the order but persisted IEC to buy SK1 shares from Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Miss Charuwan, who were his debtors. Later Miss
receivership by the Central Bankruptcy Court's order. Mr. Bhusana acknowledged the order but persisted IEC to buy SK1 shares from Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Miss Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup, who were his debtors
in absolute receivership by the Central Bankruptcy Court's order. Mr. Bhusana acknowledged the order but persisted IEC to buy SK1 shares from Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Miss. Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup
Central Bankruptcy Court's order. Mr. Bhusana acknowledged the order but persisted IEC to buy SK1 shares from Mr. Sutin and Miss. Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup, who were his debtors. Later Mr. Sutin repaid
(Baht 2,212 million) which was charged from the contract party, resulting in substantial rise in net profit of Q1/2010 at Baht 1,788.1 million which rose by 193.47% from the same period of 2009. Mr
(Baht 2,212 million) which was charged from the contract party, resulting in substantial rise in net profit of Q1/2010 at Baht 1,788.1 million which rose by 193.47% from the same period of 2009. Mr
million) which was charged from the contract party, resulting in substantial rise in net profit of Q1/2010 at Baht 1,788.1 million which rose by 193.47% from the same period of 2009. Mr. Choavalit as a
cryptocurrencies. In this regard, Bitkub by Mr. Sakolkorn acknowledged such action but did not oppose. Bitkub’s offence was resulted from the instruction or the failure to give instruction of Mr. Sakolkorn, Chief
other persons regarding the purchase volume or sale volume of those cryptocurrencies. In this regard, Bitkub by Mr. Sakolkorn acknowledged such action but did not oppose. Bitkub’s offence was resulted