to order or act where he has the duty, resulted in the offence committed by Zipmex concerning the case that since January 1, 2022, Zipmex has not been providing policies, measures, and guidance for
dishonestly and seeking wrongful gains, which caused damage to IEC, through a purchase transaction of 25% of SK1 shares at the amount of 100 million baht. The transaction was executed after SK1 had been placed
Public Company Limited (IEC), through a purchase transaction of 25% of SK1 shares at the amount of 100 million baht. The transaction was executed after SK1 had been placed in absolute receivership by the
International Engineering Public Company Limited (IEC), through a purchase transaction of 25% of SK1 shares at the amount of 100 million baht. The transaction was executed after SK1 had been placed in absolute
International Engineering Public Company Limited (IEC), through a purchase transaction of 25% of SK1 shares at the amount of 100 million baht. The transaction was executed after SK1 had been placed in absolute
allowing the trading account to be used for the YCI transaction in exchange for compensation. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was final. SEC Act S.243(1) in conjunction
allowing the trading account to be used for the YCI transaction in exchange for compensation. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was final. SEC Act S.243(1) in conjunction
Miss Keerarat Viphosupan help Mr. Yinganan to buy and sell SSPF securities by offer money transaction in buying and transfer the money which her receives from selling this securities for Mr. Yinganan
(Form 59) in accordance with the SEC’s regulations, as his spouse had conducted a transaction involving ARROW securities on 28 August 2020.. However, Mr. Lertchai failed to prepared and disclosed the
in securities holdings (Form 59) in accordance with the SEC’s regulations, as his spouse had conducted a transaction involving ARROW securities on 7 July 2020. However, Mr. Tanon failed to prepared