Bangkok, August 17, 2015 ? The SEC filed a criminal complaint against Parin Pruksawan for committing front running in the Thailand Futures Exchange (TFEX) with the Economic Crime Suppression Division of the Royal Thai Police (ECD Police). The SEC found that during December 17, 2013 ? January 9, 2014, Parin, then a trader of DBS Vickers Securities (Thailand) Co., Ltd., had front run his clients? futures trading orders through an account linked to him at another broker for his personal gain. This...
Bangkok, 21 November 2016 - The SEC has revoked the approval of eight securities investment consultants of {X1} Public Company Limited for committing frauds against the assets of mutual fund clients. In this regard, six of the offenders are banned for the maximum period of 10 years each, and the other two for five years each. In addition, three branch managers of the bank were penalized for misconduct related to the offences of the investment consultants. Following an inspection report of {X1},...
Bangkok, February 12, 2016 ? The SEC is seeking public comments on draft amendments to the principles and regulations on granting of approval for marketing agents of private funds (PF) and derivatives fund (DF) managers to enhance flexibility for business operation and adjust timeframes for approval procedures in accordance with the Licensing Facilitation Act of 2015. The draft amendments have taken into account the important role of PF and DF marketing agents in soliciting investors to use inv...
to consultation papers and more convenient participation in the hearing process. The website is accessible via multiple devices such as desktop, tablet and mobile phone, to fit the users
a number of orders via mobile phone. For {B}, the SEC probed into the case and found that she failed to keep complete record of a number of a client's securities trading orders and admitted that the
had received the trading orders from the client's authorized person via mobile phone. The SEC further probed into the case and found communication record between {A} and the client's authorized person
order form (Form F8) despite the fact that those trading orders were made via mobile phone. Use of Form F8 therefore was inappropriate submission of trading orders because such Form must be used in
misconduct of which he had previously committed. He admitted receiving the client's trading orders through LINE Application and mobile phone from time to time, after that he called the client to confirm the
submitting orders via mobile phone before re-submitting the orders via the phone recorder in order to make up the evidence that the client had made her own trading decision. The investigation found that {A
accounts. Those orders were submitted without sources and {ก} admitted that he took trading orders via mobile phone. In addition, he received the trading orders from one client for another client's