statements. The scope of power and duties is clearly specified. Directors / executives must not have untrustworthy characteristics pursuant to the specified criteria and have their names on the database
company does not proceed, then the company secretary may request the audit committee to consider the matter, and if it turns out to be a related party transaction, make sure it complies with the governing
company does not proceed, then the company secretary may request the audit committee to consider the matter, and if it turns out to be a related party transaction, make sure it complies with the governing
related party transactions? How are the transactions transparent, equitable, reasonable and beneficial to the shareholders? Disclosed information Last period transactions: Names of related party and their
their investment money plus benefits. Afterward, they repeated the same method by persuading the clients to continue investing in order to seek unfair personal gains all over again. In addition, some of
been passed. Q: In case a listed company suggests that the shareholders who cannot attend the shareholders' meeting give proxy to an independent director to vote on their behalf, is it considered a
products above are not digital assets approved by SEC under the governing law; (2) Those products above have not been screened with regard to their qualifications and smart contracts by SEC-approved ICO
SEC within 90 days (within 14 August 2018) to continue their business until an order to discontinue their businesses is given. Earlier, SEC disclosed the names of seven digital asset business operators
strengthened. It is sug- gested that jurisdictions regularly review whether their supervisory, regulatory and enforcement au- thorities are sufficiently resourced, independent and empowered to deal with
areas, with a relatively comprehensive framework and high levels of compliance. However, it also finds some gaps: 2 principle are implemented at 50 (out of a 100 percent) or less, and 14 at 75 or less