executive of SUPER, had an access to the material information by virtue of being assigned by SUPER to contact and coordinate with SCCC. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry
been disclosed to the public and she has access by virtue of her office or position. Mrs. Supritha sends orders to buy 7,940,100 shares of PTL in Polyplex (Asia) Pte. Ltd. (“PAPL”)’s securities trading
to the public and they have access by virtue of their office or position. PCL, Mr. Pranay and Mr. Manish jointly use the inside information to instruct PAPL to buy 7,940,100 shares of PTL in PAPL’s
to changes in the prices of PTL shares which has not yet been disclosed to the public and he has access by virtue of his office or position. Mr. Amit, PAPL, Polyplex Corporation Limited (“PCL”) which
to the public and he has access by virtue of his office or position and acts in a way as to take advantage of other persons as follows: (1) uses the information on PTL’s performance in the standalone
review responsibility of her audit group. She had the authorized access to view the draft financial statements in the EY information system and disclosed the inside information of the three companies to
quarter of 2016 to the third quarter of 2017 of seven listed company clients by taking advantage of Mr. Warot’s authorized access to the draft financial statements in the EY information system and the
Mr. Warot Norkeo 1. During 16 February 2015 – 29 July 2016, Mr. Warot, the assistant auditor holding the manager position, used inside information on the operating results from the fourth quarter of