SEC Secretary-General Ruenvadee Suwanmongkol, along with SEC Deputy Secretary-General Sirivipa Supantanet, and management team met with H.E. Mr. Sou Socheat, Director General of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Cambodia (SECC), and executives in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, on August 5, 2019.On this occasion, both regulators exchanged views on cooperation and assistance that the SECC and SEC Thailand will provide to each other with regard to cross-border equity offering and depositary re...
The MOU signed today is a result of a fruitful discussion between SEC Thailand and the SECC on the occasion of a courtesy visit to Cambodia in early August this year. This MOU reaffirms mutual intention to promote and support the successful implementation of cross-border equity offering and depositary receipt (DR) and serves as another important milestone to reflect the strong relationship between SEC Thailand and SECC in addition to the MOU signed in 2014. This MOU covers the establishm...
filled up at the moment, the SEC official who accepts the application and the applicant must sign their names on the record of defect and the list of evidentiary documentation, and a period of time for the
moment, the SEC official who accepts the application and the applicant must sign their names on the record of defect and the list of evidentiary documentation, and a period of time for the applicant to fix
securities in multiple jurisdictions would be shortened, providing more certainty to the issuer in terms of the time-to-market.Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand are the first three jurisdictions to sign the MOU
Offeror : PRIME-TIME COMPANY LIMITED | Date of submission of the Statement of Intention : 01/11/2005
Offeror : PRIME-TIME COMPANY LIMITED | Date of submission of the Statement of Intention : 22/10/2007
English (United States) News_Detail Sign In × Home > News/Market Data > SEC News > News Detail × SEC News
English (United States) News_Detail Sign In × Home > News/Market Data > SEC News > News Detail × SEC News
to complete the transactions. The client had given prior consent to her act claiming it was inconvenient to affix signature in person at the time. Despite no intention to conceal information in the