that: · all partners, senior or other members of the firm notify the firm regarding potential employment with any audit client of the firm; and · whether they be removed from the engagement team; and
work done is appropriate? 2 Do the firm’s responses to quality risks specify assigning the responsibility for reviewing all reports, financial statements, and working papers to a reviewer who is senior
-time or part-time auditors and individuals in the service delivery center) 3 Does the firm always acquire satisfactory references when engaging senior and high-level audit staff? 4 Does the firm examine
accept marginal /unsatisfactory accounting / disclosure, including “opinion shopping”? 10 How does firm deal with domineering/awkward personalities at Board or senior management level? 11 How does firm
as the definitions of each final risk level. 3 To what extent, does each relevant source contribute to the identification of quality objectives, quality risks, and responses? Please provide an estimate
points/concerns have been followed up. B9 Where the firm operates as part of a network under common monitoring policies and procedures: (a) Whether the firm receives the overall scope, extent, and results
as regards line tracks, and, to the extent necessary for electric train operations, as regards sidings, or where the infrastructure will be fit for use by zero tailpipe CO2 emission trains within 10