. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under

authorized director, causing the company to suffer losses. His action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation

Mr. Sanith Adhyanasakul Mr. Sanith Adhyanasakul, Chief Executive Officer of Property Perfect Public Company Limited (?PF?) ,who is responsible for the operation of PF, had duty to supervise the

Mr. Wutthiphum Jurangkool Mr. Wutthiphum Jurangkool, Chief Executive Officer of Nok Airlines Public Company Limited (?NOK?) ,who is responsible for the operation of NOK, had duty to supervise the

Mr. Surin Tohtubtiang Mr. Surin Tohtubtiang, Chief Executive Officer of Kuang Pei San Food Products Public Company Limited (“POMPUI”), who is responsible for the operation of POMPUI, had duty to

Securities Public Company Limited (?AEC?) (Changed the name to Beyond Securities Public Company Limited) failed to perform her duty resulting in AEC?s violation of section 97 SEC Act S.283 Settlement

Mr. Somprasong Panjalak Mr. Somprasong Panjalak, Managing Director who is responsible for the operation of Prime Road Power Public Company Limited (?PRIME?), had duty to supervise the preparation

Roojai Company Limited Roojai Company Limited ("ROOJAI"), a securities issuer, had a duty to prepare and submit the financial statement for the year 2021 within 31 June 2022. However

Roojai Company Limited Roojai Company Limited ("ROOJAI") had a duty to prepare and submit the key financial ratio for the year 2021 within 30 June 2022. However, ROOJAI prepared and

Phuket Fantasea Public Company Limited Phuket Fantasea Public Company Limited (“PHUKET”) had a duty to prepare and submit the financial statement for the year 2021 within 31 March 2022. However