damage from proceeding accordingly. The first case involves four entities, namely: (1) Gilt Edge International (Group) Ltd. ? Thailand representative office, represented by Mrs. Karen Elizabeth Entwistle
2 กรณี ได้แก่ กรณีแรก ก.ล.ต. กล่าวโทษผู้กระทำผิด 4 ราย คือ (1) สำนักงานผู้แทนกิลท์ เอ็ดจ์ อินเตอร์เนชั่นแนล (กรุ๊ป) ลิมิเต็ด ในประเทศไทย (Gilt Edge) (โดย นางคาเรน อลิซาเบธ เอนท์วิสเทิล ในฐานะผู้รับผิด
extension of the bond maturity date for a period of two years, consideration for approval of a partial repayment of the principal by not less than 25 percent of the principal of the bond at the face value
extension of the CMO23NA bond maturity date for a period of two years, from 27 November 2023 to 27 November 2025, and consideration for approval of partial repayment of the principal of the bond by
being considered as an event of default; 2. Partial repayment of the principal of the bond; 3. Increase in the coupon rate of the bond; 4. Request for a waiver of default of the principal and interest
statements for the year 2023, as a cause of default of the terms of rights of SNW231A, SNW233A and SNW224A bonds; Agenda Item 4: Consideration for approval of a partial repayment of the principal, with a
offering (PO) and private placement (PP); removing a minimum 10 million baht of face value in all cases and a minimum redemption value of 80% of principal in case of PP. The revised regulations to become
found that Bantherngsak gave the client mutual fund investment advice describing that the principal would not be affected. The said advice was given, even though the client made investment in a mixed fund
the client mutual fund investment advice describing that the principal would not be affected. The said advice was given, even though the client made investment in a mixed fund having medium to high risk
extension of the bond maturity date for a period of one year and six months; Agenda item 2: Consideration for approval of a partial repayment of the principal by reducing the face value per unit by not