and major shareholder of WHA, disseminate news about the negotiation of purchase deal with other listed company by giving interview to The Press which may cause any other person to understand that the
Stock Exchange of Thailand on 13 March 2017 and his statement at the press conference the following day when he reassured that the foreign borrowers were unrelated to him. As a result, he is liable to
executive of SUPER, had an access to the material information by virtue of being assigned by SUPER to contact and coordinate with SCCC. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry
to the public and they have access by virtue of their office or position. PCL, Mr. Pranay and Mr. Manish jointly use the inside information to instruct PAPL to buy 7,940,100 shares of PTL in PAPL’s
been disclosed to the public and she has access by virtue of her office or position. Mrs. Supritha sends orders to buy 7,940,100 shares of PTL in Polyplex (Asia) Pte. Ltd. (“PAPL”)’s securities trading
review responsibility of her audit group. She had the authorized access to view the draft financial statements in the EY information system and disclosed the inside information of the three companies to
Mr.Viroj Patcharawattanakul Mr.Viroj Patcharawattanakul is legally presumed to have knowledge or possession of inside information, and able to access inside information relating to the AAPICO Hitech
to changes in the prices of PTL shares which has not yet been disclosed to the public and he has access by virtue of his office or position. Mr. Amit, PAPL, Polyplex Corporation Limited (“PCL”) which