professional skepticism exercised by the engagement team? - How does the EQr evaluate the involvement and independence of the EP? - How does the EQr evaluate whether appropriate consultation has taken place on
system of quality management (SOQM)? If yes, Does the firm leadership provide the designated partner with the required authority and resources and take responsibility for the adequacy of firm’s response
the firm have a partner or manager level individual who is responsible for its monitoring process? If yes, does the responsible person have sufficient and appropriate experience, authority, and time
is relevant and reliable information to enable proper functioning of SOQM? 2 How does the firm manage the information system (including the use of paper-based and electronic forms) to ensure that it
to key members of client management and those charged with governance? 8 Do engagement partners have the appropriate capabilities, competence, authority and time to perform the role? 9 Are the
responsibility of all independence issues? If yes, Does he/she have the seniority, experience, authority and resources and take responsibility for the adequacy of firm’s procedures? 2 For firms without designated
fits into 15% best available in Thailand (in its weight class) in terms of GHG emissions per tkm. Amber category is available until 2030, after it only green category is available for this article. The
Questionnaire No. Particulars Firm's Reference /Guidance Notes Description 1 Does the audit firm design and implement the risk assesment process that includes the identification of quality objectives
0.02091 ECL 138,283,412 12.47078 ECL-W4 460,000 0.12446 EE 639,143,810 22.99078 EFORL 60,395,083 1.51068 EGATIF 9,006,201 0.43185 EGCO 9,048,012 1.71864 EKH 70,715,471 10.47800 EMC 6,691,333 0.07934 EP
638,673,813 22.97388 EFORL 54,660,259 1.36724 EGATIF 7,814,202 0.37469 EGCO 8,453,819 1.60577 EKH 70,439,871 10.43716 EMC 6,391,308 0.07578 EP 158,335,669 16.97957 EP-W4 15,684,538 6.72812 EPG 17,239,323