due diligence and care in the same manner as a professional would exercise in like circumstance and with regard to customer’s best interest. SEC Act S.133 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 11/2022
considered that the transactions entailed the best interest for clients and failed to provide measures for preventing conflict of interests. SEC Act S.283 paragraph 1 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 2
. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under
authorized director, causing the company to suffer losses. His action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation
Securities and Exchange Act of Thailand B.E. 2535 (1992) (“SEC Act”) instructing the directors of EARTH to provide explanation about the reasonability of private placement, the company and shareholders’ best
shareholders’ best interest regarding the private placement, effects to share price and shareholder control, reasons of offering shares of EARTH at a price of 0.0001 Baht per share, consideration of book value
the reasonability of private placement, the company and shareholders’ best interest regarding the private placement, effects to share price and shareholder control, reasons of offering shares of EARTH
of private placement, the company and shareholders’ best interest regarding the private placement, effects to share price and shareholder control, reasons of offering shares of EARTH at a price of