shares inconsistent with the normal market condition, to lure the public into the trading. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.243(2) in
, resulting in the purchase or sale of such shares inconsistent with normal market condition, to mislead and lure the public into the trading. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the
shares inconsistent with the normal market condition, to lure the public into the trading. He entered the settlement process but failed to pay the fine as ordered by Settlement Committee. The public
in high volume and its price was changed. As a result, the trading of TAPAC shares contradicted normal market conditions. 09/11/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil
high volume and its price was changed. As a result, the trading of TAPAC shares contradicted normal market conditions. 09/11/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty
believing that TAPAC shares were traded in high volume and its price was changed. As a result, the trading of TAPAC shares contradicted normal market conditions. 09/11/2017 agreed to comply with civil
mislead the general public to believe that PYLON shares were purchased or sold in great volume at that time which was not consistent with the normal market conditions. Additionally, he continuously traded
normal market conditions. Additionally, he continuously traded UMI shares to lure the general public to purchase or sell such shares which resulted in the purchase or sale of UMI shares not consistent with