liability of the 2nd defendant and the 3rd defendant to jointly pay such civil penalty; (2) The 2nd defendant and the 3rd defendant shall personally pay the civil penalty in the amount of 2,000,000 Baht for
lawsuit of the plaintiff. The Civil Court also imposed civil sanctions as follows: (1) The 1st defendant shall pay the civil penalty in the amount of 2,000,000 Baht with liability of the 2nd defendant and
an SECC Holding’s director and executive with responsibility and due care by attending the Board of Directors’ meeting in which the fictitious loans worth Baht 245 million agenda was approved and
. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under
authorized director, causing the company to suffer losses. His action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation
review responsibility of her audit group. She had the authorized access to view the draft financial statements in the EY information system and disclosed the inside information of the three companies to
(6) Mr. Tanyapisist Saprod and (7) Miss Metta Poking jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and
jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and obtained unlawful gains for themselves or another person which