Appeal Court rendered a judgement* amending the Civil Court’s judgement, by requiring the defendant to pay (1) a civil penalty, twice the amount of the benefits that the defendant received or would have
. Por. 5964/2562. On 22 December 2020, the Appeal Court rendered the judgement,* opposing the Civil Court’s decision. In this regard, the defendant is required to pay civil penalty twice the amount of
until the payment is fully completed, and Ekkamon to pay 333,333.33 baht. Both monetary penalties shall be submitted as state revenue. On 26 May 2020, the Court of Appeal confirmed the judgment of the
’ list and then may exercise the right to appeal such DBD’s decision.According to Section 42 of the Administrative Procedure Act B.E. 2539 (1996), an administrative order shall be effective since the
Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal Region I, Dr. Poomsiri Dumrongvute, Lecturer of the Faculty of Law, Chulalongkorn University, and Mr. Jinnah Yamuam, Money and Banking subcommittee member, Thailand
state agency or set a short validation period for such ID documents. This may cause some shareholders or their proxies to be rejected from the AGM and may as well impose high costs on foreign shareholders
baht for the violation which occurred during August 18- October 7, 1992. The execution of imprisonments were not suspended.Later, the Appeal Court affirmed and amended the Bangkok South Criminal Court's
baht for the violation which occurred during August 18- October 7, 1992. The execution of imprisonments were not suspended.Later, the Appeal Court affirmed and amended the Bangkok South Criminal Court?s
Nuprapat and Kanchana with the Bangkok South Criminal Court.The Bangkok South Criminal Court and the Appeal Court ruled against Nuprapat and Kanchana and sentenced them to a five-year imprisonment for
Essentially, the amendments would postpone the deadline for the licensed companies subscribing to the National Digital ID (NDID) platform to comply with the e-KYC Guidelines to 1 January 2021, one