guilty, the penalties were reduced by half to the imprisonment of one year. Later, the Appeal Court adjudicated to count the prison sentence for the 1st defendant (Mr. Pornthep) following the red number
penalties were reduced by half to the imprisonment of one year. Later, the Appeal Court adjudicated to count the prison sentence for the 1st defendant (Mr. Pornthep) following the red number 1004/2561, 3300
trade volume of Thai Enger Holding Public Company (TIGER) with intention of getting the price of TIGER stocks to be higher than IPO price. SEC Act S.244/3(1)(2) in conjunction with Section 83 of the
Bath 3.50 per share which was higher than tender offer price Baht 1.25 per share. Therefor, the tender offer price given to all holders of securities of the same class and issue was not in the same form
rate of baht 0.94 per share which was higher than dividend paid in the last 5 years. He obtained the material non- public information by virtue of his positions before such information became public on
RPC interim dividend at the rate of baht 0.94 per share which was higher than dividend paid in the last 5 years. He obtained the material non- public information by virtue of his positions before such
of OSK Investment Bank Berhad, Malaysia (OSKIB) in purchasing shares of BSEC from BFIT with the offer price significantly higher than the market price, thus requiring OSKIB make a tender offer for
significantly higher than the market price, thus requiring CPALL make a tender offer for acquisition of all MAKRO shares at the same price. He obtained the material non- public information by virtue of his