to order or act where he has the duty, resulted in the offence committed by Zipmex concerning the case that Zipmex has duties to submit the report of penetration test result to the SEC office within

later entirely cancelled. His intention in placing selling orders was to test the market, without intention to execute transactions, in such a way that misleads other persons regarding the price or

the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the public prosecutor cannot bring the alleged offender to trial. DV Act

the company. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the alleged offender escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the alleged offender to trial

, the public prosecutor cannot bring the alleged offender to trial. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 23/06/2010

., Ltd. in 2004. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the alleged offender escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the alleged offender to trial

sanctions under Section 125. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the accused to trial. DV Act

issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the alleged offender escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the alleged offender to trial. SEC Act S.307 308 311 Criminal

trial. SEC Act S.307 308 311 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 13/03/2009

public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the accused to trial. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244