Bangkok, 13 September 2016 - The SEC has imposed a two-year suspension of approval on {A}, Executive Chairman of {X1} Company Limited, for failing to supervise the Know Your Client/Client Due Diligence (KYC/CDD) as well as client activity oversight systems. Additionally, the SEC is in the process of submitting the? case for consideration of the Criminal Fining Committee.During a routine inspection of {X1} Company Limited, the SEC found deficiencies in the company's KYC/CDD system. Also its clien...
, increasingly emphasize the importance of audit quality factor in the selection of auditors. Qualitative information in the firm inspection report is thus very useful for the selection process. In addition, the
In November 2019, SEC engaged the Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI) to conduct a study on laws pertaining to the supervision of audit firms and auditors in foreign capital markets for supporting amendment of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (Securities and Exchange Act) to allow more effective and efficient supervision of audit firms and auditors in Thai capital market.SEC Secretary-General Ruenvadee Suwanmongkol said: “This is the first time SEC contracts an independ...
to consultation papers and more convenient participation in the hearing process. The website is accessible via multiple devices such as desktop, tablet and mobile phone, to fit the users
a number of orders via mobile phone. For {B}, the SEC probed into the case and found that she failed to keep complete record of a number of a client's securities trading orders and admitted that the
had received the trading orders from the client's authorized person via mobile phone. The SEC further probed into the case and found communication record between {A} and the client's authorized person
order form (Form F8) despite the fact that those trading orders were made via mobile phone. Use of Form F8 therefore was inappropriate submission of trading orders because such Form must be used in
misconduct of which he had previously committed. He admitted receiving the client's trading orders through LINE Application and mobile phone from time to time, after that he called the client to confirm the
submitting orders via mobile phone before re-submitting the orders via the phone recorder in order to make up the evidence that the client had made her own trading decision. The investigation found that {A
accounts. Those orders were submitted without sources and {ก} admitted that he took trading orders via mobile phone. In addition, he received the trading orders from one client for another client's