through four transactions of the company’s advance payment for four business partners worth totaling 265 million baht and by falsifying revenue worth totaling 44 million baht. The revenue was not a result
transactions of the company’s advance payment for four business partners worth totaling 265 million baht and by falsifying revenue worth totaling 44 million baht. The revenue was not a result of the company’s
through four transactions of the company’s advance payment for four business partners worth totaling 265 million baht and by falsifying revenue worth totaling 44 million baht. The revenue was not a result
results showed the net earnings of 14.25 million Baht, which was a significant increase compared to the Q3/2014. 15/09/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty
. The financial statement for the year 2016 did not comply with the Thai Accounting Standard no.18 (revised 2015), Revenue (TAS 18) and clause 14 a(i) of IAS - IE 18. Later, the rectified financial
the SET and the SEC Office. The Form 56-1 did not comply with the Thai Accounting Standard no.18 (revised 2015), Revenue (TAS 18) and clause 14 a(i) of IAS - IE 18. Later, the rectified Form 56-1 was
Office.The Form 56-2 did not comply with the Thai Accounting Standard no.18 (revised 2015), Revenue (TAS 18) and clause 14 a(i) of IAS – IE 18. Later, the rectified Form 56-2 was filed with the SET and the SEC
earnings, which was a significant increase compared to the annual financial statement of 2014. 25/08/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :
3,858,100 BIG shares by utilizing the non-public information he accessed by virtue of his position. Such information was the annual financial statement of 2015 operating results showed the net earnings, which
accounting, to falsify documents about financial aid from Coke in order to record as revenue, resulting in increase of profits in the financial statements for the year 2002 of DAIDO. In addition, he colluded