including facilities and other infrastructures made it difficult to compare the rental and service fee with other available lands and buildings. However, taking into consideration of the followings, it is
Principles were presented, as was the extensive evidence base that was developed in the process of their revision. The Principles are outcome-based, adaptable to different country circumstances and more
simpler and easier to track over time; setting a different metric for each mode based on best in class performance would be difficult to monitor as it would require resources to keep updating it
efficient allocation of resources. It focuses on the quality and consistency the different elements of regulations that influence corporate governance practices and the division of responsibilities between
each type of investment unit, and, in cases where different types of investment units have different policies about returns or the priority return, clear details about the nature and conditions of
start of this project are lower than buying new lands for development. At present, to procure or to collect big plots of land that have adjacent area are quite difficult and use a lot of investment funds
investment, impact investing, ESG engagement, stewardship, socially responsible investment (SRI) and sustainability investment will imply different activities for different parties. And, confusingly, sometimes
eligibility criteria, and describes the next stages in developing further criteria on other solar sector assets These issues include: Criteria for different types of solar assets e.g. solar PV plants
program for auditing difficult and complex areas, staff training limited to theoretical lectures and lack of case study on issues requiring professional judgement and professional skepticism, particularly
acceptable international standards among different capital markets is considered the driving force to stimulate cross-border investments, and thus propelling such integration and linkages forward. Being