(Baht 2,212 million) which was charged from the contract party, resulting in substantial rise in net profit of Q1/2010 at Baht 1,788.1 million which rose by 193.47% from the same period of 2009. Mr
(Baht 2,212 million) which was charged from the contract party, resulting in substantial rise in net profit of Q1/2010 at Baht 1,788.1 million which rose by 193.47% from the same period of 2009. Mr
million) which was charged from the contract party, resulting in substantial rise in net profit of Q1/2010 at Baht 1,788.1 million which rose by 193.47% from the same period of 2009. Mr. Choavalit as a
Protection for Subscribers upon the Expiration of Concession Agreements or the Agreement to Operate B.E. 2013. and (2) the Arbitral Tribunal ordering TRUE to pay TOT Public Company Limited (“TOT”) penalty for
Company Limited (a 100-percent subsidiary of IEC) through a contract with Energy System Engineering and Service Co., Ltd. (ESES), deemed under control of Mr. Bhusansa and Mr. Saran, for the construction of
to misappropriate 80.1 million Baht from Rayong Wire Industries, an Eastern Wire subsidiary, through a contract for advanced procurement of raw materials with Union Gas and Chemicals Co., Ltd. in 2004
IEC through the transactions related to the outsourcing contract with Thai-Chin Engineering & Construction where Mr. Rattanathorn Shinkrajangkij and Ms. Yadapat Shinkrajangkij were directors. The
misappropriating money of IEC through the transactions related to the outsourcing contract with Thai-Chin Engineering & Construction where Mr. Rattanathorn Shinkrajangkij and Ms. Yadapat Shinkrajangkij were
other persons. Mr. Bhusana committed a fraud by misappropriating money of IEC through the transactions related to the outsourcing contract with Thai-Chin Engineering & Construction where Mr
inconsistent with the facts to deceive other persons. Mr. Bhusana committed a fraud by misappropriating money of IEC through the transactions related to the outsourcing contract with Thai-Chin Engineering &