owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial statements for the
outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial statements for the year 2015 without
the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial
the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial
believing that the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual
auditor into believing that the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the
shares reached or passed a multiple of five percent of the total outstanding shares or the total number of voting rights of UKEM. She later filed the accurate report (Form 246-2) to the SEC Office on April
through monthly financial statement of January and February 2016 to buy 258,200 PTL shares in Mr. Rahul’s securities trading account on March 17, 2016 and jointly with Mr. Anurag use the information on
financial statements of Q4/2016 which he knows through monthly financial statement of January and February 2016 to buy 200,000 PTL shares in his securities trading account on March 11 and 17, 2016 and jointly
finance director, in seeking improper benefits from the rental and buy-back of advertising billboards. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.281/2