out the second letter of payment request and prepared a set of documents to lawyer for prosecution if the debt negotiation was failed. On February 22, 2017, MAT contacted the Company to request time for
out the second letter of payment request and prepared a set of documents to lawyer for prosecution if the debt negotiation was failed. On February 22, 2017, MAT contacted the Company to request time for
January 25, 2017, the Legal Department sent out the second letter of payment request and prepared a set of documents to lawyer for prosecution if the debt negotiation was failed. On February 22, 2017, MAT
lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company. Consequencely, the Company has not
Company. The Company’s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company
. 3. The Group had the selling and administrative expenses, amount Baht 34.08 million, increase by Baht 13.29 million or 64.15 percent due to the main reason as follows: 3.1) Lawyer expenses, amount
plaintiff's cost and attorney fees of THB 10,000, instead of the plaintiff. At present, the court has issued a enforcement order to prepare for seizure following the procedure. 1.2 Muse Group Bangkok Company
September 2017) until the settlement to the plaintiff. The defendant shall pay the plaintiff's cost and attorney fees of THB 10,000, instead of the plaintiff. Indeed, the court has already issued the
expenses incurred from the subsidiary’s share acquisition ie. loan , advisory and lawyer fees for an aggregated amount of THB 2.3 million. Earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation (“EBITDA”) EBITDA
lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company. Consequencely, the Company has not