out the second letter of payment request and prepared a set of documents to lawyer for prosecution if the debt negotiation was failed. On February 22, 2017, MAT contacted the Company to request time for
January 25, 2017, the Legal Department sent out the second letter of payment request and prepared a set of documents to lawyer for prosecution if the debt negotiation was failed. On February 22, 2017, MAT
responding and counterclaiming for damages in the amount by Baht 106. 3 million, including the interest, on the ground of the breach of contract against the Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the
lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company. Consequencely, the Company has not
Company. The Company’s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company
. 3. The Group had the selling and administrative expenses, amount Baht 34.08 million, increase by Baht 13.29 million or 64.15 percent due to the main reason as follows: 3.1) Lawyer expenses, amount
plaintiff's cost and attorney fees of THB 10,000, instead of the plaintiff. At present, the court has issued a enforcement order to prepare for seizure following the procedure. 1.2 Muse Group Bangkok Company
September 2017) until the settlement to the plaintiff. The defendant shall pay the plaintiff's cost and attorney fees of THB 10,000, instead of the plaintiff. Indeed, the court has already issued the
knowledge and ability to proceed with the class action case without a conflict of interest with members of the class, and he or she can pay the advance payment for the procedure of class action. 5. Lawyer Fee